On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Kevin
Grittner<
Kevin.Grittner@...> wrote:
> I think you mean byte where you've said bit.
you're correct. I'm being a nerf.
> Boolean would be
> adequate for a single bit, and I haven't (so far) seen any database
> which supports both a single-bit type and a boolean.
wasn't aware of that. I'm admittedly most familiar with sqlite,
postgres, and mysql
> Many databases
> support a TINYINT type as a single-byte value, although I'm not sure
> there's consistency on whether that's a signed or unsigned value.
wouldn't any implementation in pg support both?
--
Caleb Cushing
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
pgsql-hackers@...)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
