Hi all,
Could I please get a reminder about what's what with the branches?
Should I be ignoring SLASHEM_VAMPIRE and SLASHEM_PHLEGETHON?
I built (and released [finally]) the dos binaries for 0.0.7E7F2 and in the
process I found a minor bug that prevents compilation in dos only, and
only if pure ansi build type is chosen. I felt that because I was forced
to fix that in order to bake the DOS release, it had to go into VAMPIRE,
but for the rest? If I find any more bugs should I just use HEAD?
Sorry about this I know these questions have probably been answered ages
ago but I took leave of slashem for a while and would like to start
working on it now again and just need a prod in the right direction ;)
for interrest sake, I'm keeping my own live repositories of just the
changes required for DOS building of the 3 DOS interfaces, you can browse
the repositories (if you feel drawn to this type of information) here:
http://www.usrsrc.org/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=slashem-dos-ansi;a=summaryhttp://www.usrsrc.org/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=slashem-dos-vga;a=summaryhttp://www.usrsrc.org/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=slashem-dos-allegro;a=summaryIt makes my life a lot easier having these and should speed up future dos
binary building.
--
Clive Crous
http://www.darkarts.co.za/-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642_______________________________________________
Slashem-devel mailing list
Slashem-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/slashem-devel
