|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
sql.DataSourceDefinition(s) annotationsHi,
Where should we put these two new annotations ? Thanks, Rémy _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|
|
Re: sql.DataSourceDefinition(s) annotationsDoes it make sense to put it here?
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/src/main/javax/annotation/ Or need another module under javaee? Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > Where should we put these two new annotations ? > > Thanks, > Rémy > > _______________________________________________ > jboss-development mailing list > jboss-development@... > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|
|
Re: sql.DataSourceDefinition(s) annotationsOn Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread@...> wrote:
> Does it make sense to put it here? > https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/src/main/javax/annotation/ > > Or need another module under javaee? No idea. EJB is everything I suppose ! But this javaee repository is missing things right now for sure. Like JSP. Not using a monolithic tree for that is actually a mistake IMO, it's only APIs. Rémy _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|
|
Re: sql.DataSourceDefinition(s) annotationsRémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread@...> wrote: >> Does it make sense to put it here? >> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/src/main/javax/annotation/ >> >> Or need another module under javaee? > > No idea. EJB is everything I suppose ! But this javaee repository is > missing things right now for sure. Like JSP. > Not using a monolithic tree for that is actually a mistake IMO, it's only APIs. Tell that to all the project that want full control of the apis. :-) _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|
|
Re: sql.DataSourceDefinition(s) annotationsOn Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread@...> wrote:
> Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread@...> wrote: >>> Does it make sense to put it here? >>> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/src/main/javax/annotation/ >>> >>> Or need another module under javaee? >> >> No idea. EJB is everything I suppose ! But this javaee repository is >> missing things right now for sure. Like JSP. >> Not using a monolithic tree for that is actually a mistake IMO, it's only APIs. > > Tell that to all the project that want full control of the apis. :-) Ok, got it. So for now I'll add the two annotations in metadata-common to be able to do the work ;) Rémy _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
|
|
Re: sql.DataSourceDefinition(s) annotationsWe can do the same as we recently did for javax.interceptor APIs: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-development/2009-October/014967.html Shelly ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rémy Maucherat" <remy.maucherat@...> To: "JBoss.org development list" <jboss-development@...> Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:09:18 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [jboss-dev] sql.DataSourceDefinition(s) annotations On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread@...> wrote: > Rémy Maucherat wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Dimitris Andreadis <dandread@...> wrote: >>> Does it make sense to put it here? >>> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/projects/javaee/trunk/jboss-ejb-api/src/main/javax/annotation/ >>> >>> Or need another module under javaee? >> >> No idea. EJB is everything I suppose ! But this javaee repository is >> missing things right now for sure. Like JSP. >> Not using a monolithic tree for that is actually a mistake IMO, it's only APIs. > > Tell that to all the project that want full control of the apis. :-) Ok, got it. So for now I'll add the two annotations in metadata-common to be able to do the work ;) Rémy _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development _______________________________________________ jboss-development mailing list jboss-development@... https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |