|

»

standard or exo portlet

View: New views

7 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	standard or exo portlet by alamut :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi my friends, i am a novice in working with portals. I started by creating simple portlets and am trying now to export such work to Exo. According to Exo examples, all the portled extends UIPortlet, they use the framlework ressources by a different way then the standard one. i would like to have your viewpoint. In other word, should we follow the Exo paradigm during developping process or developing standard portlet as usually. Thanx in advance.
	Re: standard or exo portlet by brice.revenant :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Hi, This JSF-based framework is aimed at developing eXo-provided Portlets. It is subject to change in subsequent releases. Reusing it in your own projects means that you run the risk of having to rewrite some code one day. For this reason, this seems preferrable to write pure JSR 168 Portlets. This will make easy the future migration toward the Enterprise WebOS. HTH -Brice. -- Brice REVENANT Bull, Architect of an Open World TM phone: +33 (0)4 76 29 74 22 http://www.bull.com This e-mail contains material that is confidential for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -----alamut <h.siahmed@...> wrote: ----- To: exoplatform@... From: alamut <h.siahmed@...> Date: 22/03/2007 02:45PM Subject: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet Hi my friends, i am a novice in working with portals. I started by creating simple portlets and am trying now to export such work to Exo. According to Exo examples, all the portled extends UIPortlet, they use the framlework ressources by a different way then the standard one. i would like to have your viewpoint. In other word, should we follow the Exo paradigm during developping process or developing standard portlet as usually. Thanx in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/standard-or-exo-portlet-tf3447565.html#a9614878 Sent from the eXo Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: sympa@... ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
	RE: standard or exo portlet by kito99 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message If he's targeting eXo 3.x/portal 2.0, I think it'd make sense to use JSF as a web app framework for building portlets (without the eXo extensions). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 * From: brice.revenant@... [mailto:brice.revenant@...] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:45 PM To: exoplatform@... Cc: alamut Subject: Re: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet Hi, This JSF-based framework is aimed at developing eXo-provided Portlets. It is subject to change in subsequent releases. Reusing it in your own projects means that you run the risk of having to rewrite some code one day. For this reason, this seems preferrable to write pure JSR 168 Portlets. This will make easy the future migration toward the Enterprise WebOS. HTH -Brice. -- Brice REVENANT Bull, Architect of an Open World TM phone: +33 (0)4 76 29 74 22 http://www.bull.com This e-mail contains material that is confidential for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -----alamut <h.siahmed@...> wrote: ----- To: exoplatform@... From: alamut <h.siahmed@...> Date: 22/03/2007 02:45PM Subject: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet Hi my friends, i am a novice in working with portals. I started by creating simple portlets and am trying now to export such work to Exo. According to Exo examples, all the portled extends UIPortlet, they use the framlework ressources by a different way then the standard one. i would like to have your viewpoint. In other word, should we follow the Exo paradigm during developping process or developing standard portlet as usually. Thanx in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/standard-or-exo-portlet-tf3447565.html#a9614878 Sent from the eXo Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: sympa@... ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
	Re: standard or exo portlet by alamut :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Thank's a Lot for your advices. Best Regards, Halim
	Re: standard or exo portlet by Luca Bernardini :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message We developed about 25 portlet of our "Statim" a B2B e-commerce, using JSF. I think it is a good solution for stay "open". There are 2 little problems with jsf-messages but afeter patching them, all the rest runs well. if you want to take a look... http://www.digisol.it/statimdemo Luca Bernardini Kito D. Mann wrote: If he's targeting eXo 3.x/portal 2.0, I think it'd make sense to use JSF as a web app framework for building portlets (without the eXo extensions). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 * From: brice.revenant@... [brice.revenant@...] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:45 PM To: exoplatform@... Cc: alamut Subject: Re: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet Hi, This JSF-based framework is aimed at developing eXo-provided Portlets. It is subject to change in subsequent releases. Reusing it in your own projects means that you run the risk of having to rewrite some code one day. For this reason, this seems preferrable to write pure JSR 168 Portlets. This will make easy the future migration toward the Enterprise WebOS. HTH -Brice. -- Brice REVENANT Bull, Architect of an Open World TM phone: +33 (0)4 76 29 74 22 http://www.bull.com This e-mail contains material that is confidential for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -----alamut h.siahmed@... wrote: ----- To: exoplatform@... From: alamut h.siahmed@... Date: 22/03/2007 02:45PM Subject: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet Hi my friends, i am a novice in working with portals. I started by creating simple portlets and am trying now to export such work to Exo. According to Exo examples, all the portled extends UIPortlet, they use the framlework ressources by a different way then the standard one. i would like to have your viewpoint. In other word, should we follow the Exo paradigm during developping process or developing standard portlet as usually. Thanx in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/standard-or-exo-portlet-tf3447565.html#a9614878 Sent from the eXo Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: sympa@... ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: sympa@... ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws `[luca.bernardini.vcf]` `begin:vcard fn:Luca Bernardini n:Bernardini;Luca org:digisol;sviluppo adr:;;via Flaminia, 134/N;Rimini;RN;47900;Italy email;internet:luca.bernardini@... tel;work:0541 382570 tel;fax:0541 309143 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.digisol.it version:2.1 end:vcard` -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
	RE: standard or exo portlet by kito99 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Luca, What sort of problems did you have with messages? Also, would you be interested in participating in JSF Central's "In the Trenches" series (http://www.jsfcentral.com/trenches). A suite of 25 JSF portlets would be a great story... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info phone: +1 203-653-2989 fax: +1 203-653-2988 * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 * From: Luca Bernardini [mailto:luca.bernardini@...] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:50 AM To: kmann@... Cc: brice.revenant@...; exoplatform@...; 'alamut' Subject: Re: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet We developed about 25 portlet of our "Statim" a B2B e-commerce, using JSF. I think it is a good solution for stay "open". There are 2 little problems with jsf-messages but afeter patching them, all the rest runs well. if you want to take a look... http://www.digisol.it/statimdemo Luca Bernardini Kito D. Mann wrote: If he's targeting eXo 3.x/portal 2.0, I think it'd make sense to use JSF as a web app framework for building portlets (without the eXo extensions). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 * From: brice.revenant@... [brice.revenant@...] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:45 PM To: exoplatform@... Cc: alamut Subject: Re: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet Hi, This JSF-based framework is aimed at developing eXo-provided Portlets. It is subject to change in subsequent releases. Reusing it in your own projects means that you run the risk of having to rewrite some code one day. For this reason, this seems preferrable to write pure JSR 168 Portlets. This will make easy the future migration toward the Enterprise WebOS. HTH -Brice. -- Brice REVENANT Bull, Architect of an Open World TM phone: +33 (0)4 76 29 74 22 http://www.bull.com This e-mail contains material that is confidential for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -----alamut h.siahmed@... wrote: ----- To: exoplatform@... From: alamut h.siahmed@... Date: 22/03/2007 02:45PM Subject: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet Hi my friends, i am a novice in working with portals. I started by creating simple portlets and am trying now to export such work to Exo. According to Exo examples, all the portled extends UIPortlet, they use the framlework ressources by a different way then the standard one. i would like to have your viewpoint. In other word, should we follow the Exo paradigm during developping process or developing standard portlet as usually. Thanx in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/standard-or-exo-portlet-tf3447565.html#a9614878 Sent from the eXo Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: sympa@... ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: sympa@... ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
	Re: standard or exo portlet by Luca Bernardini :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message there are 2 problems with jsf and exo. 1) jsf 1.1 reference implementation from Sun, have a bug when an Exeption is thrown from jsf lifecycle. When an error occour, the interested portlet, cannot escape from errror and there isn't a way to reset the error. Looking at MyFaces implementation, we have patched this problem. 2) Since exo-portal 1.0, there is an error in jsf messages management. Using <h:messages> in jsf portlets, and consuming an ERROR message and, after that, an INFO message, the latest one is lost. So, in a portlet action, if I append a INFO faces message, when the JSP is rendered, nothing appear. The bug is in org.exoplatform.portlet.faces.context.FacesPortletContextImpl in method: getMaximumSeverity() About this second point, I posted in the newsletter in march 22 2007, but browsing the objectweb site http://mail-archive.objectweb.org/exoplatform/2007-03/mail1.html , there is no trace. I asked the exo development team to acquire this patch for future release... For your JSF Central's "In the Trenches", of course I'm interested. Can you write me directly to explain me how to contribute ? Thank you Kito Kito D. Mann wrote: Luca, What sort of problems did you have with messages? Also, would you be interested in participating in JSF Central's "In the Trenches" series (http://www.jsfcentral.com/trenches). A suite of 25 JSF portlets would be a great story... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info phone: +1 203-653-2989 fax: +1 203-653-2988 * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 * From: Luca Bernardini [luca.bernardini@...] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 3:50 AM To: kmann@... Cc: brice.revenant@...; exoplatform@...; 'alamut' Subject: Re: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet We developed about 25 portlet of our "Statim" a B2B e-commerce, using JSF. I think it is a good solution for stay "open". There are 2 little problems with jsf-messages but afeter patching them, all the rest runs well. if you want to take a look... http://www.digisol.it/statimdemo Luca Bernardini Kito D. Mann wrote: If he's targeting eXo 3.x/portal 2.0, I think it'd make sense to use JSF as a web app framework for building portlets (without the eXo extensions). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info * Sign up for the JSF Central newsletter! http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17 * From: brice.revenant@... [brice.revenant@...] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:45 PM To: exoplatform@... Cc: alamut Subject: Re: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet Hi, This JSF-based framework is aimed at developing eXo-provided Portlets. It is subject to change in subsequent releases. Reusing it in your own projects means that you run the risk of having to rewrite some code one day. For this reason, this seems preferrable to write pure JSR 168 Portlets. This will make easy the future migration toward the Enterprise WebOS. HTH -Brice. -- Brice REVENANT Bull, Architect of an Open World TM phone: +33 (0)4 76 29 74 22 http://www.bull.com This e-mail contains material that is confidential for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -----alamut h.siahmed@... wrote: ----- To: exoplatform@... From: alamut h.siahmed@... Date: 22/03/2007 02:45PM Subject: [exoplatform] standard or exo portlet Hi my friends, i am a novice in working with portals. I started by creating simple portlets and am trying now to export such work to Exo. According to Exo examples, all the portled extends UIPortlet, they use the framlework ressources by a different way then the standard one. i would like to have your viewpoint. In other word, should we follow the Exo paradigm during developping process or developing standard portlet as usually. Thanx in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/standard-or-exo-portlet-tf3447565.html#a9614878 Sent from the eXo Platform mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: sympa@... ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: sympa@... ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws `[luca.bernardini.vcf]` `begin:vcard fn:Luca Bernardini n:Bernardini;Luca org:digisol;sviluppo adr:;;via Flaminia, 134/N;Rimini;RN;47900;Italy email;internet:luca.bernardini@... tel;work:0541 382570 tel;fax:0541 309143 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.digisol.it version:2.1 end:vcard` -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the exoplatform@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:exoplatform-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws