static routing

View: New views
9 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

static routing

by beko :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

is it possible to set static routing?
I had to edit /etc/init.d/rc.local and add: route add -net ...

I think this should be also in web management.

Re: static routing

by Peter Warasin :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

hi

beko wrote:
> is it possible to set static routing?
> I had to edit /etc/init.d/rc.local and add: route add -net ...
> I think this should be also in web management.

it's currently under development

peter

--
:: e n d i a n
:: open source - open minds

:: peter warasin
:: http://www.endian.it   :: peter@...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Re: static routing

by Josephw :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Peter Warasin wrote:
hi beko wrote: > is it possible to set static routing? > I had to edit /etc/init.d/rc.local and add: route add -net ... > I think this should be also in web management. it's currently under development peter -- :: e n d i a n :: open source - open minds :: peter warasin :: http://www.endian.it :: peter@endian.it ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Efw-user mailing list Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
yeah , good question , EFW works perfectly except for static route, I had tried to add static route manually, but it didn't work. I checked everything, but still don't know what happend. Before EFW finish development, Is there any SOP of adding static routes ?

Re: static routing

by Patricio A. Bruna :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

What problems do you have with statict routing?

>
>     Peter Warasin wrote:
>     hi beko wrote: > is it possible to set static routing? > I had to
>     edit /etc/init.d/rc.local and add: route add -net ... > I think
>     this should be also in web management. it's currently under
>     development peter -- :: e n d i a n :: open source - open minds ::
>     peter warasin :: http://www.endian.it :: peter@...
>     -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
>     security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to
>     make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server
>     v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>     http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>     _______________________________________________ Efw-user mailing
>     list Efw-user@...
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
>
> yeah , good question , EFW works perfectly except for static route, I
> had tried to add static route manually, but it didn't work. I checked
> everything, but still don't know what happend. Before EFW finish
> development, Is there any SOP of adding static routes ?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> View this message in context: Re: static routing
> <http://www.nabble.com/static-routing-tf2115612.html#a6488957>
> Sent from the efw-user <http://www.nabble.com/efw-user-f4485.html>
> mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Efw-user mailing list
> Efw-user@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
>  


--
Patricio Bruna V.
Red Hat Certified Engineer
IT Linux Ltda.
http://www.it-linux.cl
Fono : (+56-2) 333 0051
Cel  : (+56-09) 8288 5195


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Re: static routing

by Josephw :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Patricio Bruna V.-2 wrote:
What problems do you have with statict routing?
ok Here is the network diagram

Internet
     |
     |
 IP_A
[EFW]
  ip_a
     |
     |
LAN_A
     |
     |
[cisco router]
     |
     |
LAN_B
     |
     |
ip_b[PC1]


1.I want to make PC1 be able to connect to the internet via EFW

2.I added the route for reaching LAN_B on EFW

3. I added the default route for accessing the internet on cisco router.

4.I added firewall policy which allows nods on LAN_B accessing the internet

5. The nodes on LAN_A could reach the internet.

6.I could ping EFW/ip_a from PC1

7. I also could ping PC1 with source ip  EFW/ip_a

8. But I could not ping IP_A and other  ip addresses in the internet from PC1

9.I used command tcpdump to observe icmp packets while I ping from PC1 to internet ip. there are always two related packets like below
      ICMP reply  Destination -> IP_A
      ICMP reply  Destination -> ip_b
  compare with ping from nodes on LAN_A , there's no 2nd ICMP reply packet.

thanks for help

Re: static routing

by Patricio A. Bruna :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I think you have to add a "routeback" rules for ping from IP_B(PC1) to IP_A. I had a similar setup, but with 17 subnets.
What i do was:
iptables -I FORWARD 1 -s IP_NETWORK_B/NETMASK -d IP_NETWORK_A/NETMASK -i br0 -o br0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD 1 -d IP_NETWORK_B/NETMASK -s IP_NETWORK_A/NETMASK -i br0 -o br0 -j ACCEPT

i had to put those lines in /etc/init.d/rc.local

----- Original Message -----
From: Josephw <josephw@...>
To: efw-user@...
Sent: martes 26 de septiembre de 2006 23H35 GMT-0400
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] static routing




Patricio Bruna V.-2 wrote:
>
> What problems do you have with statict routing?
>

ok Here is the network diagram

Internet
     |
     |
 IP_A
[EFW]
  ip_a
     |
     |
LAN_A
     |
     |
[cisco router]
     |
     |
LAN_B
     |
     |
ip_b[PC1]


1.I want to make PC1 be able to connect to the internet via EFW

2.I added the route for reaching LAN_B on EFW

3. I added the default route for accessing the internet on cisco router.

4.I added firewall policy which allows nods on LAN_B accessing the internet

5. The nodes on LAN_A could reach the internet.

6.I could ping EFW/ip_a from PC1

7. I also could ping PC1 with source ip  EFW/ip_a

8. But I could not ping IP_A and other  ip addresses in the internet from
PC1

9.I used command tcpdump to observe icmp packets while I ping from PC1 to
internet ip. there are always two related packets like below
      ICMP reply  Destination -> IP_A
      ICMP reply  Destination -> ip_b
  compare with ping from nodes on LAN_A , there's no 2nd ICMP reply packet.

thanks for help
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/static-routing-tf2115612.html#a6519965
Sent from the efw-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Re: static routing

by Josephw :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I spent entire day to try what you wrote, but it dosen't still work.
eventhough this , the situation is kind of different from before.
here is my lab
       
              PC(210.17.1.2/24)
                |
                |
              eth1(210.17.1.1/24)
             [EFW]
               br0(192.168.3.89/24)
                |
                |
              e0/0(192.168.3.100/24)
          [cisco router]
              loop0(192.168.4.100/24)
configuration:
[EFW]
 1.allow all traffic from Green interface to RED interface
 2.disable proxy
 3. iptables -I FORWARD 1 -s 192.168.4.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -j ACCEPT
     iptables -I FORWARD 1 -d 192.168.4.0/24 -s 0.0.0.0/0 -j ACCEPT

 4. Kernel IP routing table
       Destination     Gateway                Genmask             Flags     Metric     Ref        Use Iface
       192.168.3.0   *                           255.255.255.0      U         0          0            0 br0
       210.17.1.0     *                           255.255.255.0      U         0          0            0 eth1
       192.168.4.0   192.168.3.100         255.255.255.0      UG       0          0            0 br0
        default         210.17.1.254           0.0.0.0                 UG       0          0            0 eth1

symptom
 1.cisco router source 192.168.3.100 -->ping-->pc   ok
 2.EFW source 192.168.3.89--> ping --> 192.168.4.100 ok
 3.cisco router source 192.168.4.100 -->ping->pc failed
 tcpdump -n -p icmp -i br0
  IP 192.168.4.100 > 210.17.1.2: icmp 80: echo request seq 1280
  IP 192.168.4.100 > 210.17.1.2: icmp 80: echo request seq 1280
  IP 192.168.4.100 > 210.17.1.2: icmp 80: echo request seq 1280
  IP 192.168.4.100 > 210.17.1.2: icmp 80: echo request seq 1280
  IP 192.168.4.100 > 210.17.1.2: icmp 80: echo request seq 1280

 tcpdump -n -p icmp -i eth1
  IP 210.17.1.1> 210.17.1.2: icmp 80: echo request  seq 1280
  IP 210.17.1.2> 210.17.1.1: icmp 80: echo reply seq 1280
  IP 210.17.1.1> 210.17.1.2: icmp 180: host 192.168.4.100 unreachable
 
  ...

  thanks for help


Patricio Bruna V.-2 wrote:
I think you have to add a "routeback" rules for ping from IP_B(PC1) to IP_A. I had a similar setup, but with 17 subnets.
What i do was:
iptables -I FORWARD 1 -s IP_NETWORK_B/NETMASK -d IP_NETWORK_A/NETMASK -i br0 -o br0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD 1 -d IP_NETWORK_B/NETMASK -s IP_NETWORK_A/NETMASK -i br0 -o br0 -j ACCEPT

i had to put those lines in /etc/init.d/rc.local

----- Original Message -----
From: Josephw <josephw@mail.josephw.idv.tw>
To: efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: martes 26 de septiembre de 2006 23H35 GMT-0400
Subject: Re: [Efw-user] static routing




Patricio Bruna V.-2 wrote:
>
> What problems do you have with statict routing?
>

ok Here is the network diagram

Internet
|
|
IP_A
[EFW]
ip_a
|
|
LAN_A
|
|
[cisco router]
|
|
LAN_B
|
|
ip_b[PC1]


1.I want to make PC1 be able to connect to the internet via EFW

2.I added the route for reaching LAN_B on EFW

3. I added the default route for accessing the internet on cisco router.

4.I added firewall policy which allows nods on LAN_B accessing the internet

5. The nodes on LAN_A could reach the internet.

6.I could ping EFW/ip_a from PC1

7. I also could ping PC1 with source ip EFW/ip_a

8. But I could not ping IP_A and other ip addresses in the internet from
PC1

9.I used command tcpdump to observe icmp packets while I ping from PC1 to
internet ip. there are always two related packets like below
ICMP reply Destination -> IP_A
ICMP reply Destination -> ip_b
compare with ping from nodes on LAN_A , there's no 2nd ICMP reply packet.

thanks for help
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/static-routing-tf2115612.html#a6519965 
Sent from the efw-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV 
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Re: static routing

by Peter Warasin :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

hi

Josephw wrote:
> I spent entire day to try what you wrote, but it dosen't still work.
> eventhough this , the situation is kind of different from before.
> here is my lab

i think you run into the same problem, i always run if something does
not work with a hop behind green.

try this:

ip rule add prio 5 to 192.168.4.0/24 lookup main


our module which does loadbalancing of multiple red interfaces
introduced a tricky routing configuration.
each connection leaving the red interface will be marked by iptables
mangle and then redirected to a separate routknkg table (ip route show
table 200) in order to always leave the same interface even if the
routing decision for that host will change due to expiration of the
routing cache.

the line above just says to look to the main routing table even if the
connection is marked.
otherwise the packets to local networks will also leave the red
interface instead of green.

hope this helps

peter

--
:: e n d i a n
:: open source - open minds

:: peter warasin
:: http://www.endian.it   :: peter@...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user

Re: static routing

by Josephw :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

hi

I solved the problem with your suggestion !

Thanks alot

Peter Warasin wrote:
hi

Josephw wrote:
> I spent entire day to try what you wrote, but it dosen't still work.
> eventhough this , the situation is kind of different from before.
> here is my lab

i think you run into the same problem, i always run if something does
not work with a hop behind green.

try this:

ip rule add prio 5 to 192.168.4.0/24 lookup main


our module which does loadbalancing of multiple red interfaces
introduced a tricky routing configuration.
each connection leaving the red interface will be marked by iptables
mangle and then redirected to a separate routknkg table (ip route show
table 200) in order to always leave the same interface even if the
routing decision for that host will change due to expiration of the
routing cache.

the line above just says to look to the main routing table even if the
connection is marked.
otherwise the packets to local networks will also leave the red
interface instead of green.

hope this helps

peter

--
:: e n d i a n
:: open source - open minds

:: peter warasin
:: http://www.endian.it   :: peter@endian.it

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Efw-user mailing list
Efw-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user