struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage

View: New views
4 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage

by James Cook-13 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi All,

 

Pretty certain this is a bug, but I can't get

 

struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage

 

To be noticed, I am using 2.1.6 libs

 

Any one suggest anything?

 

Cheers

 

James

 


RE: struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage

by James Cook-13 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Infact I think I have answered my own question.

In context of my previous email regarding the scanning, this bug:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3234

The XWorks scans all classes on the CP first then the
PackageBasedActionConfigBuilder attempts to eval, and I am assuming this
is where the basePackage element is used and not in the original scan.
Is this a correct assumption?

Is it possible for me to get hold of this source and back it into a
2.1.6 lib? Just we have a domain with 5 apps in and the scanning is
causing deployment to take 10-20 mins.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Cook
Sent: 29 October 2009 10:13
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage

Hi All,

 

Pretty certain this is a bug, but I can't get

 

struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage

 

To be noticed, I am using 2.1.6 libs

 

Any one suggest anything?

 

Cheers

 

James

 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


Re: struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage

by Musachy Barroso :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

you can just build it from trunk, and dump the new convention jar into
your existing app, it should work.

musachy

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:16 AM, James Cook <James.Cook@...> wrote:

> Infact I think I have answered my own question.
>
> In context of my previous email regarding the scanning, this bug:
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3234
>
> The XWorks scans all classes on the CP first then the
> PackageBasedActionConfigBuilder attempts to eval, and I am assuming this
> is where the basePackage element is used and not in the original scan.
> Is this a correct assumption?
>
> Is it possible for me to get hold of this source and back it into a
> 2.1.6 lib? Just we have a domain with 5 apps in and the scanning is
> causing deployment to take 10-20 mins.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Cook
> Sent: 29 October 2009 10:13
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Pretty certain this is a bug, but I can't get
>
>
>
> struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage
>
>
>
> To be noticed, I am using 2.1.6 libs
>
>
>
> Any one suggest anything?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> James
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


RE: struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage

by James Cook-13 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Just did :-).

I took source from the Struts 2.1.6 and the xwork 2.1.2 tags and have
backward ported Brians fix to it. Passes the unit tests and works on
deployments. Just need to confirm I haven't broken anything else because
of it.

Must say, quite fun rolling around the Struts internals...

-----Original Message-----
From: Musachy Barroso [mailto:musachy@...]
Sent: 29 October 2009 16:35
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage

you can just build it from trunk, and dump the new convention jar into
your existing app, it should work.

musachy

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:16 AM, James Cook <James.Cook@...>
wrote:
> Infact I think I have answered my own question.
>
> In context of my previous email regarding the scanning, this bug:
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3234
>
> The XWorks scans all classes on the CP first then the
> PackageBasedActionConfigBuilder attempts to eval, and I am assuming
this

> is where the basePackage element is used and not in the original scan.
> Is this a correct assumption?
>
> Is it possible for me to get hold of this source and back it into a
> 2.1.6 lib? Just we have a domain with 5 apps in and the scanning is
> causing deployment to take 10-20 mins.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Cook
> Sent: 29 October 2009 10:13
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Pretty certain this is a bug, but I can't get
>
>
>
> struts.convention.package.locators.basePackage
>
>
>
> To be noticed, I am using 2.1.6 libs
>
>
>
> Any one suggest anything?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> James
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@...