symposium thought

View: New views
16 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

symposium thought

by Sam Pluta :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

hey all,

i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past  
weekend.  i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me  
most about this gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's  
work was.  nothing presented was at all similar to anything else -  
with people doing everything from live coding to installations to  
interface driven performance to live manipulation -  and this is a  
sign that we are on to something as a group.

thanks for that,
i had a great time,

sam

                        www.wetink.org
www.sampluta.com
                                        www.carrierrecords.com
        myspace.com/glissandobinladen






_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by James Harkins-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

+1  -- I really appreciated seeing the hugely divergent ways we are using this fantastic tool.

In response to Andrea's question about notes on the symposium: I've started on something here:


hjh


On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Sam Pluta wrote:

hey all,

i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past weekend.  i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me most about this gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's work was.  nothing presented was at all similar to anything else - with people doing everything from live coding to installations to interface driven performance to live manipulation -  and this is a sign that we are on to something as a group.


: H. James Harkins
.::!:.:.......:.::........:..!.::.::...:..:...:.:.:.:..:

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman


Re: symposium thought

by loriend :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

A comment here as you've turned them off there:

I read about the single sample SC in computer music journal just
yesterday and thought to myself what a wonderful thing the Low Level
Virtual Machine project (http://llvm.org) with it's optimisers and JIT
compilers could be for  both sclang and scsynth. No need for C code
these days :)


cheers,
Lorien

James Harkins wrote:

> +1  -- I really appreciated seeing the hugely divergent ways we are
> using this fantastic tool.
>
> In response to Andrea's question about notes on the symposium: I've
> started on something here:
>
> http://www.dewdrop-world.net/words/
>
> hjh
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Sam Pluta wrote:
>
>> hey all,
>>
>> i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past
>> weekend.  i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me
>> most about this gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's
>> work was.  nothing presented was at all similar to anything else -
>> with people doing everything from live coding to installations to
>> interface driven performance to live manipulation -  and this is a
>> sign that we are on to something as a group.
>
>
> : H. James Harkins
> : jamshark70@... <mailto:jamshark70@...>
> : http://www.dewdrop-world.net
> .::!:.:.......:.::........:..!.::.::...:..:...:.:.:.:..:
>
> "Come said the Muse,
> Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
> Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman
>


_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by Click Nilson :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On this note, many thanks to Sam for his help in Manhattan, and to  
Ron and the Wesleyan team for all their hard work for the symposium  
itself!

On 14 Apr 2009, at 06:34, Sam Pluta wrote:

> hey all,
>
> i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past  
> weekend.  i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me  
> most about this gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's  
> work was.  nothing presented was at all similar to anything else -  
> with people doing everything from live coding to installations to  
> interface driven performance to live manipulation -  and this is a  
> sign that we are on to something as a group.
>
> thanks for that,
> i had a great time,
>
> sam
>
> www.wetink.org
> www.sampluta.com
> www.carrierrecords.com
> myspace.com/glissandobinladen
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/ 
> sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/


_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by Dan Stowell :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Sam you're right, there was an astonishing lack of deja-vu in the
conference sessions - the diversity was great. Props to everyone for
all the fascinating topics, and thanks to everyone who organised and
helped run stuff.

Dan


2009/4/14, Sam Pluta <spluta@...>:

> hey all,
>
>  i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past weekend.
> i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me most about this
> gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's work was.  nothing
> presented was at all similar to anything else - with people doing everything
> from live coding to installations to interface driven performance to live
> manipulation -  and this is a sign that we are on to something as a group.
>
>  thanks for that,
>  i had a great time,
>
>  sam
>
>                         www.wetink.org
>  www.sampluta.com
>                                         www.carrierrecords.com
>         myspace.com/glissandobinladen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  sc-users mailing list
>
>  info (subscription, etc.):
> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
>  archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
>  search:
> http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
>


--
http://www.mcld.co.uk

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by Scott Wilson-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

As I've said before to some of you, I think one of the most wonderful  
things about the symposium is it's not about a particular style. If  
anything, it's about a mindset (to which SC is appealing).

S.

On 14 Apr 2009, at 19:41, Dan Stowell wrote:

> Sam you're right, there was an astonishing lack of deja-vu in the
> conference sessions - the diversity was great. Props to everyone for
> all the fascinating topics, and thanks to everyone who organised and
> helped run stuff.
>
> Dan
>
>
> 2009/4/14, Sam Pluta <spluta@...>:
>> hey all,
>>
>> i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past  
>> weekend.
>> i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me most about  
>> this
>> gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's work was.  nothing
>> presented was at all similar to anything else - with people doing  
>> everything
>> from live coding to installations to interface driven performance  
>> to live
>> manipulation -  and this is a sign that we are on to something as a  
>> group.
>>
>> thanks for that,
>> i had a great time,
>>
>> sam
>>
>>                        www.wetink.org
>> www.sampluta.com
>>                                        www.carrierrecords.com
>>        myspace.com/glissandobinladen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sc-users mailing list
>>
>> info (subscription, etc.):
>> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
>> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
>> search:
>> http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
>>
>
>
> --
> http://www.mcld.co.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/


_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by Dan Stowell :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

PS blogged:
http://www.mcld.co.uk/blog/blog.php?247

2009/4/14, Scott Wilson <s.d.wilson.1@...>:

> As I've said before to some of you, I think one of the most wonderful things
> about the symposium is it's not about a particular style. If anything, it's
> about a mindset (to which SC is appealing).
>
>  S.
>
>
>  On 14 Apr 2009, at 19:41, Dan Stowell wrote:
>
>
> > Sam you're right, there was an astonishing lack of deja-vu in the
> > conference sessions - the diversity was great. Props to everyone for
> > all the fascinating topics, and thanks to everyone who organised and
> > helped run stuff.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > 2009/4/14, Sam Pluta <spluta@...>:
> >
> > > hey all,
> > >
> > > i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past
> weekend.
> > > i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me most about this
> > > gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's work was.  nothing
> > > presented was at all similar to anything else - with people doing
> everything
> > > from live coding to installations to interface driven performance to
> live
> > > manipulation -  and this is a sign that we are on to something as a
> group.
> > >
> > > thanks for that,
> > > i had a great time,
> > >
> > > sam
> > >
> > >                       www.wetink.org
> > > www.sampluta.com
> > >                                       www.carrierrecords.com
> > >       myspace.com/glissandobinladen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > sc-users mailing list
> > >
> > > info (subscription, etc.):
> > >
> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> > > archive:
> http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> > > search:
> > > http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.mcld.co.uk
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sc-users mailing list
> >
> > info (subscription, etc.):
> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> > archive:
> http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> > search:
> http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
> >
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  sc-users mailing list
>
>  info (subscription, etc.):
> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
>  archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
>  search:
> http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
>


--
http://www.mcld.co.uk

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by andrea valle-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

(Thanks James)

Lorien, humble question: really cannot understand a word, but curious....

-a-


On 14 Apr 2009, at 15:47, Lorien Dunn wrote:

A comment here as you've turned them off there:

I read about the single sample SC in computer music journal just yesterday and thought to myself what a wonderful thing the Low Level Virtual Machine project (http://llvm.org) with it's optimisers and JIT compilers could be for  both sclang and scsynth. No need for C code these days :)


cheers,
Lorien

James Harkins wrote:
+1  -- I really appreciated seeing the hugely divergent ways we are using this fantastic tool.

In response to Andrea's question about notes on the symposium: I've started on something here:


hjh


On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Sam Pluta wrote:

hey all,

i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past weekend.  i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me most about this gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's work was.  nothing presented was at all similar to anything else - with people doing everything from live coding to installations to interface driven performance to live manipulation -  and this is a sign that we are on to something as a group.


: H. James Harkins
.::!:.:.......:.::........:..!.::.::...:..:...:.:.:.:..:

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman



_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list


--------------------------------------------------
Andrea Valle
--------------------------------------------------
CIRMA - DAMS
Università degli Studi di Torino
--------------------------------------------------
" This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous." 
(Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski)


LLVM and supercollider. Was Re: symposium thought

by loriend :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

OK,
    LLVM is a C++ library that could be linked with sclang and scsynth
that would provide highly optimised just in time compiled native code.
It's getting used in "nextgen" scripting languages like the rubinius
ruby vm (google it if interested).

    In sclang what would have to happen is either

    1)the current bytecode would have to be translated into llvm
bytecode inside sclang before passing it over to the llvm compilation
process.
    2)the sclang virtual machine could be ditched entirely and sclang
code compiled directly to LLVM bytecode, before being handed over to the
llvm compilation process.

    either way would result in a very big speed boost for sclang.

    For scsynth:

       How'd you like to write unit generators in sclang? They could
probably be made to run faster than those written in C++: instead of
each unit generator being optimised by a C++ compiler in isolation, all
the graphs on scsynth could be just in time compiled and optimised as
one whole program.  You could do the single sample stuff without
anything like the compilation/link/load into process latency mentioned
as the killer in that keynote (that alas I didn't see being in Melbourne).

    It would also speed up block based ugen graphs, but who knows how
much by.


    For both scsynth and sclang it would take quite a bit of work, but
the results could be spectacular I think.


Lorien



Andrea Valle wrote:

> (Thanks James)
>
> Lorien, humble question: really cannot understand a word, but curious....
>
> -a-
>
>
> On 14 Apr 2009, at 15:47, Lorien Dunn wrote:
>
>> A comment here as you've turned them off there:
>>
>> I read about the single sample SC in computer music journal just
>> yesterday and thought to myself what a wonderful thing the Low Level
>> Virtual Machine project (http://llvm.org) with it's optimisers and
>> JIT compilers could be for  both sclang and scsynth. No need for C
>> code these days :)
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>> Lorien
>>
>> James Harkins wrote:
>>> +1  -- I really appreciated seeing the hugely divergent ways we are
>>> using this fantastic tool.
>>>
>>> In response to Andrea's question about notes on the symposium: I've
>>> started on something here:
>>>
>>> http://www.dewdrop-world.net/words/
>>>
>>> hjh
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Sam Pluta wrote:
>>>
>>>> hey all,
>>>>
>>>> i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past
>>>> weekend.  i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me
>>>> most about this gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's
>>>> work was.  nothing presented was at all similar to anything else -
>>>> with people doing everything from live coding to installations to
>>>> interface driven performance to live manipulation -  and this is a
>>>> sign that we are on to something as a group.
>>>
>>>
>>> : H. James Harkins
>>> : jamshark70@... <mailto:jamshark70@...>
>>> : http://www.dewdrop-world.net
>>> .::!:.:.......:.::........:..!.::.::...:..:...:.:.:.:..:
>>>
>>> "Come said the Muse,
>>> Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
>>> Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sc-users mailing list
>>
>> info (subscription, etc.):
>> http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
>> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
>> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Andrea Valle
> --------------------------------------------------
> CIRMA - DAMS
> Università degli Studi di Torino
> --> http://www.cirma.unito.it/andrea/
> --> http://www.myspace.com/andreavalle
> --> http://www.flickr.com/photos/vanderaalle/
> -->  http://www.youtube.com/user/vanderaalle
> --> andrea.valle@... <mailto:andrea.valle@...>
> --------------------------------------------------
> " This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a
> lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous."
> (Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski)
>


_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: LLVM and supercollider. Was Re: symposium thought

by andrea valle-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Thanks, I grasped the concept

Best

-a-

On 15 Apr 2009, at 10:32, Lorien Dunn wrote:

OK,
   LLVM is a C++ library that could be linked with sclang and scsynth that would provide highly optimised just in time compiled native code. It's getting used in "nextgen" scripting languages like the rubinius ruby vm (google it if interested).

   In sclang what would have to happen is either

   1)the current bytecode would have to be translated into llvm bytecode inside sclang before passing it over to the llvm compilation process.
   2)the sclang virtual machine could be ditched entirely and sclang code compiled directly to LLVM bytecode, before being handed over to the llvm compilation process.

   either way would result in a very big speed boost for sclang.

   For scsynth:

      How'd you like to write unit generators in sclang? They could probably be made to run faster than those written in C++: instead of each unit generator being optimised by a C++ compiler in isolation, all the graphs on scsynth could be just in time compiled and optimised as one whole program.  You could do the single sample stuff without anything like the compilation/link/load into process latency mentioned as the killer in that keynote (that alas I didn't see being in Melbourne).

   It would also speed up block based ugen graphs, but who knows how much by.


   For both scsynth and sclang it would take quite a bit of work, but the results could be spectacular I think.


Lorien



Andrea Valle wrote:
(Thanks James)

Lorien, humble question: really cannot understand a word, but curious....

-a-


On 14 Apr 2009, at 15:47, Lorien Dunn wrote:

A comment here as you've turned them off there:

I read about the single sample SC in computer music journal just yesterday and thought to myself what a wonderful thing the Low Level Virtual Machine project (http://llvm.org) with it's optimisers and JIT compilers could be for  both sclang and scsynth. No need for C code these days :)


cheers,
Lorien

James Harkins wrote:
+1  -- I really appreciated seeing the hugely divergent ways we are using this fantastic tool.

In response to Andrea's question about notes on the symposium: I've started on something here:


hjh


On Apr 14, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Sam Pluta wrote:

hey all,

i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past weekend.  i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me most about this gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's work was.  nothing presented was at all similar to anything else - with people doing everything from live coding to installations to interface driven performance to live manipulation -  and this is a sign that we are on to something as a group.


: H. James Harkins
.::!:.:.......:.::........:..!.::.::...:..:...:.:.:.:..:

"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal."  -- Whitman



_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list


--------------------------------------------------
Andrea Valle
--------------------------------------------------
CIRMA - DAMS
Università degli Studi di Torino
--------------------------------------------------
" This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous." (Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski)



_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list


--------------------------------------------------
Andrea Valle
--------------------------------------------------
CIRMA - DAMS
Università degli Studi di Torino
--------------------------------------------------
" This is a very complicated case, Maude. You know, a lotta ins, a lotta outs, a lotta what-have-yous." 
(Jeffrey 'The Dude' Lebowski)


Re: symposium thought

by james mccartney :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Lorien Dunn <loriendunn@...> wrote:
> A comment here as you've turned them off there:
>
> I read about the single sample SC in computer music journal just yesterday
> and thought to myself what a wonderful thing the Low Level Virtual Machine
> project (http://llvm.org) with it's optimisers and JIT compilers could be
> for  both sclang and scsynth. No need for C code these days :)

I mentioned LLVM in the keynote.

>
>
> cheers,
> Lorien

--
--- james mccartney

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by loriend :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

James McCartney wrote:
>
> I mentioned LLVM in the keynote.
>
>  
I wish I could have been there. Something else I've pondered but
rejected as being in the too hard basket is JIT compiling synth graphs
to GPU and/or multicore CPU, I got the beginnings of it going with
RapidMind (http://www.rapidmind.net/) and had a (host side ruby
scripted) interpolating oscillator running on an nvidia card and
outputting via jack before realising just how much coding I'd set myself
up to be doing instead of music making.

Thanks very much for opening the SC code James, I'd been rejecting
supercollider for years and would be deep inside implementing a similar
language if it had remained proprietary.

Lorien

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by Anton Hörnquist-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

Which CMJ issue has an article on single sample SC? Thanks

/Anton

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Lorien Dunn <loriendunn@...> wrote:
> I read about the single sample SC in computer music journal just yesterday
> [...]

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by loriend :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

McCartney, James.
Computer Music Journal, Volume 26, Number 4, Winter 2002, pp. 61-68


Anton Hörnquist wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Which CMJ issue has an article on single sample SC? Thanks
>
> /Anton
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Lorien Dunn <loriendunn@...> wrote:
>  
>> I read about the single sample SC in computer music journal just yesterday
>> [...]
>>    
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-users mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/
>
>  


_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by miguel.negrao :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

James McCartney escreveu:

> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Lorien Dunn <loriendunn@...> wrote:
>> A comment here as you've turned them off there:
>>
>> I read about the single sample SC in computer music journal just yesterday
>> and thought to myself what a wonderful thing the Low Level Virtual Machine
>> project (http://llvm.org) with it's optimisers and JIT compilers could be
>> for  both sclang and scsynth. No need for C code these days :)
>
> I mentioned LLVM in the keynote.
>
>>
>> cheers,
>> Lorien
>
A video of this keynote, anyone ?

--
Miguel Negrão // ZLB
http://www.friendlyvirus.org/artists/zlb/

_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/

Re: symposium thought

by rags música :: Rate this Message:

Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I wish I could have gone. Next year in Berlin!

R



2009/4/14 Sam Pluta <spluta@...>
hey all,

i just wanted to write a quick note about the symposium this past weekend.  i said this to a couple of people, but what impressed me most about this gathering was how wonderfully different everyone's work was.  nothing presented was at all similar to anything else - with people doing everything from live coding to installations to interface driven performance to live manipulation -  and this is a sign that we are on to something as a group.

thanks for that,
i had a great time,

sam

                       www.wetink.org
www.sampluta.com
                                       www.carrierrecords.com
       myspace.com/glissandobinladen






_______________________________________________
sc-users mailing list

info (subscription, etc.): http://www.beast.bham.ac.uk/research/sc_mailing_lists.shtml
archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-users/
search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-users/search/