|

»

tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)

View: New views

8 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage) by Robert Zeigler :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Looking to apply the patch in this ticket; I can apply it to trunk, but it looks like there's also a strong sentiment in favor of applying the patch to the 5.1 release, as well (and, eventually, releasing 5.1.0.6). Any qualms with me making a 5.1.0.6 branch based on the 5.1.0.5 release? Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
	Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage) by Christian Edward Gruber-2 :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message +1 (not only non-binding, but with considerable conflict of interest, since I'm the one badgering Howard et. al. to have this happen ;) On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Robert Zeigler wrote: > Looking to apply the patch in this ticket; I can apply it to trunk, > but it looks like there's also a strong sentiment in favor of > applying the patch to the 5.1 release, as well (and, eventually, > releasing 5.1.0.6). Any qualms with me making a 5.1.0.6 branch > based on the 5.1.0.5 release? > > Robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > Christian Edward Gruber christianedwardgruber@... http://www.geekinasuit.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
	Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage) by Howard Lewis Ship :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message +1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Christian Gruber < christianedwardgruber@...> wrote: > +1 (not only non-binding, but with considerable conflict of interest, since > I'm the one badgering Howard et. al. to have this happen ;) > > > > On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Robert Zeigler wrote: > > Looking to apply the patch in this ticket; I can apply it to trunk, but it >> looks like there's also a strong sentiment in favor of applying the patch to >> the 5.1 release, as well (and, eventually, releasing 5.1.0.6). Any qualms >> with me making a 5.1.0.6 branch based on the 5.1.0.5 release? >> >> Robert >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > Christian Edward Gruber > christianedwardgruber@... > http://www.geekinasuit.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
	Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage) by Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message +1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
	Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage) by Howard Lewis Ship :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo < thiagohp@...> wrote: > +1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release > That's what I said. Seriously, did you copy mine, or do we come up with identical phrasing? > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor > http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
	Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage) by Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Em Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:25:49 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship <hlship@...> escreveu: > That's what I said. Seriously, did you copy mine, or do we come up with > identical phrasing? I just committed a copyright infringement. :) I copied your message. -- Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
	Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage) by Massimo Lusetti :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Howard Lewis Ship<hlship@...> wrote: > +1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release If the only changes from .5 is the XML parser implementation, no functional changes no other bug fix or what else i would name it .5 with and identifier... let's say .5-nowood Regards -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
	Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage) by Robert Zeigler :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message shrug I named it 5.1.0.x-dev, with the idea that any ongoing development of the 5.1.0 line will go there. Robert On Jul 3, 2009, at 7/38:31 AM , Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Howard Lewis Ship<hlship@...> > wrote: > >> +1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release > > If the only changes from .5 is the XML parser implementation, no > functional changes no other bug fix or what else i would name it .5 > with and identifier... let's say .5-nowood > > Regards > -- > Massimo > http://meridio.blogspot.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...