test failures in r29096 of cint.

View: New views
4 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

test failures in r29096 of cint.

by David Bremner-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Hi All;

I built today's svn of cint (revision r29096) on debian unstable amd64,
and I got the following failure when running make test. It seems to be
the only failure.

Let me know if I can provide more information.

t1126.cxx  
t1127.cxx  
t1127.cxx
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/bremner/projects/cint/test/t1127'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bremner/projects/cint/test/t1127'
t1127.cxx  -Dmakecint
signal(11) Error: Segmentation violation FILE:t1127.cxx LINE:24
Press return or process will be terminated in 10sec by timeout

signal(14) Error time out. Exit program.
FAILED with code 256:  cint -It1127  -O0  -DCINT_HIDE_FAILURE   -Dinterp   -Dmakecint  t1127.cxx > interpreted
FAILED with code 256: diff  --old-group-format="t1127.cxx compiled:%c'\012'%<" --new-group-format="t1127.cxx interpreted:%c'\012'%>" --unchanged-line-format="" --old-line-format=" %3dn: %L" --new-line-format=" %3dn: %L" compiled interpreted>> testdiff.txt
t1128.cxx  
t1129.cxx  
t1134.cxx  
t1136.cxx


Re: test failures in r29096 of cint.

by Philippe Canal :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

This is a known problem on amd64 when using the oldcore (cint5) and is
fixed when using the newcore (cint7).
I updated the testing to avoid failing in this case.

Cheers,
Philippe.


David Bremner wrote:

> Hi All;
>
> I built today's svn of cint (revision r29096) on debian unstable amd64,
> and I got the following failure when running make test. It seems to be
> the only failure.
>
> Let me know if I can provide more information.
>
> t1126.cxx  
> t1127.cxx  
> t1127.cxx
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/bremner/projects/cint/test/t1127'
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/bremner/projects/cint/test/t1127'
> t1127.cxx  -Dmakecint
> signal(11) Error: Segmentation violation FILE:t1127.cxx LINE:24
> Press return or process will be terminated in 10sec by timeout
>
> signal(14) Error time out. Exit program.
> FAILED with code 256:  cint -It1127  -O0  -DCINT_HIDE_FAILURE   -Dinterp   -Dmakecint  t1127.cxx > interpreted
> FAILED with code 256: diff  --old-group-format="t1127.cxx compiled:%c'\012'%<" --new-group-format="t1127.cxx interpreted:%c'\012'%>" --unchanged-line-format="" --old-line-format=" %3dn: %L" --new-line-format=" %3dn: %L" compiled interpreted>> testdiff.txt
> t1128.cxx  
> t1129.cxx  
> t1134.cxx  
> t1136.cxx
>
>  


Re: test failures in r29096 of cint.

by David Bremner-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Philippe Canal wrote:

>Hi,

>This is a known problem on amd64 when using the oldcore (cint5) and is
>fixed when using the newcore (cint7).
>I updated the testing to avoid failing in this case.

Thanks for the response. I _thought_ I was running the new core, but
it turned out (I think) there was a problem with the test target in
the Makefile. The ; between "LD_LIBRARY_PATH=blahblah" and running
cint meant I was using the system copy of the shared libraries.

I attach a patch.

All the best,

David





test-LD_LIBRARY_PATH.diff (1K) Download Attachment

Re: test failures in r29096 of cint.

by Philippe Canal :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi David,

Thanks for the patch, it is now in svn (r29116).

Cheers,
Philippe

David Bremner wrote:

> Philippe Canal wrote:
>
>  
>> Hi,
>>    
>
>  
>> This is a known problem on amd64 when using the oldcore (cint5) and is
>> fixed when using the newcore (cint7).
>> I updated the testing to avoid failing in this case.
>>    
>
> Thanks for the response. I _thought_ I was running the new core, but
> it turned out (I think) there was a problem with the test target in
> the Makefile. The ; between "LD_LIBRARY_PATH=blahblah" and running
> cint meant I was using the system copy of the shared libraries.
>
> I attach a patch.
>
> All the best,
>
> David
>
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>