|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
the Apache way to do thingsI have two "Apache way" questions:
1. It appears that within the community no one objects to Apache Blur. Can I put out a [vote] thread on general@ to the effect of: We acknowledge that there is some concern over the name PicaGalley. After discussions we have decided on the alternative name Apache Blur. Please vote you opinion below. Everyone's vote is binding for this vote. [ ] +1 Apache PicaGalley [ ] +1 Apache Blur [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 I don't like either name The vote is different from all that I have seen due to having two choices and I think that anyone on the general list should have a say in it. 2. Right now I have opened a bug within JIRA for Tuscany because of an issue combining Tuscany and Jackrabbit. I think that I have narrowed down that the issue is actually within Jackrabbit. 2a. Does JIRA allow you to select 2 distinct products when opening a problem? I didn't want to try it and then upset someone because of question 2b. 2b. If yes to 2a, is it akin to cross posting on the mail lists (very bad idea) to select both Jackrabbit and Tuscany as the product in question? At the moment I am working the issue but I want to keep JIRA updated correctly. Thanks for the Apache lesson. :-) Angie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: projects-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: projects-help@... |
|
|
Re: the Apache way to do thingsOn Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Angela Cymbalak <a.cymbalak@...> wrote:
> I have two "Apache way" questions: > > 1. It appears that within the community no one objects to Apache Blur. Can > I put out a [vote] thread on general@ to the effect of: > > We acknowledge that there is some concern over the name PicaGalley. After > discussions we have decided on the alternative name Apache Blur. Please > vote you opinion below. Everyone's vote is binding for this vote. > > [ ] +1 Apache PicaGalley > [ ] +1 Apache Blur > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 I don't like either name > > The vote is different from all that I have seen due to having two choices > and I think that anyone on the general list should have a say in it. > > 2. Right now I have opened a bug within JIRA for Tuscany because of an > issue combining Tuscany and Jackrabbit. I think that I have narrowed down > that the issue is actually within Jackrabbit. > 2a. Does JIRA allow you to select 2 distinct products when opening a > problem? I didn't want to try it and then upset someone because of question > 2b. > 2b. If yes to 2a, is it akin to cross posting on the mail lists (very bad > idea) to select both Jackrabbit and Tuscany as the product in question? At > the moment I am working the issue but I want to keep JIRA updated correctly. You can create a new Jackrabbit jira, and link them together... And, BTW, sorry for the delay... I'll see if I can get to your patch today. > > Thanks for the Apache lesson. :-) > > Angie > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: projects-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: projects-help@... > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: projects-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: projects-help@... |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: the Apache way to do thingsHi Angie,
> I have two "Apache way" questions: > > 1. It appears that within the community no one objects to Apache Blur. > Can I put out a [vote] thread on general@ to the effect of: That is a common misunderstanding, and some projects are or have been dreaded for their vote-happiness. This is how I formulated my views when drafting bylaws for a project earlier this year: <quote> Community decisions are consensus driven. The preferred way to establish consensus is through discussion on the public mailing lists. To gather additional input from community members, polls can be run on the same or other mailing lists. Voting on community decisions should be restricted to cases where it is necessary or desirable to formally record the consensus </quote> The important thing is to find a _consensus_, not to pass a vote. If there is a consensus, there are only few things that need a vote. If there is no consensus, passing a vote doesn't help much... You pass a vote on a controversial project name now and enter incubation. On graduation, somebody else will raise the naming question again when the vote for the TLP proposal is on. Even if you pass that vote, the TLP proposal is sent to the board, where yet other people will raise the question of the project name. And the board certainly won't care about a vote that passed a year or two earlier. They will look for a consensus at the time of graduation. So no, don't even think about calling a vote about the project name. Send a simple non-vote mail, asking how people feel about the alternative name. Make sure to mention that there is a company that has used that name, and that the respective domain is still online. Personally, I believe that is a knockout criteria. (more name suggestions coming up :-) cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: projects-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: projects-help@... |
|
|
RE: the Apache way to do thingsAngela Cymbalak wrote:
> We acknowledge that there is some concern over the name > PicaGalley. I don't. :-) I think that it is a totally unwarranted concern. > Please vote you opinion below. Everyone's vote is > binding for this vote. [X] +1 Apache PicaGalley --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: projects-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: projects-help@... |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |