|
View:
New views
10 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
to ext4 or not...Hi Guys,
I just upgraded my desktop to fedora 11. The way I set up my system is with my home directory in a separate partition so that if I want to do an upgrade by reinstalling fedora, I can then reformat / and /boot leaving /home directory is untouched. But now there is ext4. So, should I leave /home as an ext3 file system? Or should I go through the trouble of backing up /home, reformatting to ext4 and restoring? Currently / is now ext4. Thanks. Steve. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@... http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
|
|
Re: to ext4 or not...On 06/21/2009 02:30 PM, Stephen Adler wrote:
> Hi Guys, > > I just upgraded my desktop to fedora 11. The way I set up my system is > with my home directory in a separate partition so that if I want to do > an upgrade by reinstalling fedora, I can then reformat / and /boot > leaving /home directory is untouched. > > But now there is ext4. So, should I leave /home as an ext3 file system? > Or should I go through the trouble of backing up /home, reformatting to > ext4 and restoring? Currently / is now ext4. > > Additionally, I have rsnapshot running as well as my previous backup script. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf@...> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@... http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
|
|
Re: to ext4 or not...Do you see any performance improvements at all?
On 06/21/2009 04:21 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote: > On 06/21/2009 02:30 PM, Stephen Adler wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> I just upgraded my desktop to fedora 11. The way I set up my system is >> with my home directory in a separate partition so that if I want to do >> an upgrade by reinstalling fedora, I can then reformat / and /boot >> leaving /home directory is untouched. >> >> But now there is ext4. So, should I leave /home as an ext3 file system? >> Or should I go through the trouble of backing up /home, reformatting to >> ext4 and restoring? Currently / is now ext4. >> >> >> > No recommendations, but I just did that. When I resized my /home, LVM > made it ext3. I just backed up /home, reformatted to ext4, and restored. > Additionally, I have rsnapshot running as well as my previous backup > script. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@... > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@... http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
|
|
Re: to ext4 or not...Stephen Adler wrote:
> Hi Guys, > > I just upgraded my desktop to fedora 11. The way I set up my system is > with my home directory in a separate partition so that if I want to do > an upgrade by reinstalling fedora, I can then reformat / and /boot > leaving /home directory is untouched. > > But now there is ext4. So, should I leave /home as an ext3 file system? > Or should I go through the trouble of backing up /home, reformatting to > ext4 and restoring? Currently / is now ext4. I would vote for a resounding "No". If you'll remember, I posted a few weeks ago how my wife's mail file was getting clobbered and corrupted after rebuilding my server on Ubuntu Jaunty and using ext4 for my root partition. Moving /var/mail to an ext3 partition fixed the problem completely, and that's all I changed. Other than setting up a process to back it up every two hours ;) I'm really stuck now, though, because there's no way to get my root partition back to ext3. Since it's /, it's got /dev and /proc and other things you can't just tar up. So I've symlinked some critical things like /var/mail to other filesystems. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@... http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
|
|
Re: to ext4 or not...On Jun 21, 2009, at 9:05 PM, David Kramer <david@...> wrote:
> Stephen Adler wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> I just upgraded my desktop to fedora 11. The way I set up my system >> is >> with my home directory in a separate partition so that if I want to >> do >> an upgrade by reinstalling fedora, I can then reformat / and /boot >> leaving /home directory is untouched. >> >> But now there is ext4. So, should I leave /home as an ext3 file >> system? >> Or should I go through the trouble of backing up /home, >> reformatting to >> ext4 and restoring? Currently / is now ext4. > > I would vote for a resounding "No". If you'll remember, I posted a > few > weeks ago how my wife's mail file was getting clobbered and corrupted > after rebuilding my server on Ubuntu Jaunty and using ext4 for my root > partition. Not all ext4's are created equal. Red Hat has ext4 developers on staff who did a bunch of work to shore it up for Fedora 11. Kernel 2.6.29.4 and later have several key fixes that may not be in Ubuntu's 2.6.28. --jarod _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@... http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
|
|
Re: to ext4 or not...On 06/21/2009 05:33 PM, Stephen Adler wrote:
> Do you see any performance improvements at all? > I have not noticed any, but I'm not doing any performance-related tasks. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf@...> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@... http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
|
|
Re: to ext4 or not...On 06/21/2009 09:05 PM, David Kramer wrote:
> I'm really stuck now, though, because there's no way to get my root > partition back to ext3. Since it's /, it's got /dev and /proc and other > things you can't just tar up. So I've symlinked some critical things > like /var/mail to other filesystems. I haven't used it in several years, but http://www.mondorescue.org/ is perfect for putting your / on a new filesystem/RAID/LVM configuration. It'll build you a bootable cd/dvd that will restore your system in a configurable way, using the kernel/tools from your system that made the cds. (and it takes all the /dev and /proc stuff into account). Matt _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@... http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
|
|
Re: to ext4 or not...David Kramer wrote:
> I'm really stuck now, though, because there's no way to get my root > partition back to ext3. Since it's /, it's got /dev and /proc and other > things you can't just tar up. So I've symlinked some critical things > like /var/mail to other filesystems. Reboot your system onto a LiveCD (e.g., SystemRescueCD). This removes /dev, /proc, etc. from relevance, and then you can tar up the root FS. DR _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@... http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
|
|
Re: to ext4 or not...On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:28 PM, David Rosenstrauch<darose@...> wrote:
> David Kramer wrote: >> I'm really stuck now, though, because there's no way to get my root >> partition back to ext3. Since it's /, it's got /dev and /proc and other >> things you can't just tar up. So I've symlinked some critical things >> like /var/mail to other filesystems. > > Reboot your system onto a LiveCD (e.g., SystemRescueCD). This removes > /dev, /proc, etc. from relevance, and then you can tar up the root FS. > Gnu tar has lots of extra goodies,. such as "--one-file-system", which tells it not to cross over into other filesystems, such as /proc, /dev, etc. -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix GnuPG KeyID: 0xD5C7B5D9 / Email: abreauj@... GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@... http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss |
|
|
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
