tree conflict infos

View: New views
4 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

tree conflict infos

by Neels Janosch Hofmeyr-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi guys,

I notice we don't have a single test to verify the "Source left" and "Source
right" paths and peg revs shown on "a tree-conflicted" `svn info'...

~Neels

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2414219

signature.asc (205 bytes) Download Attachment

Re: tree conflict infos

by Stefan Sperling-7 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:02:21PM +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I notice we don't have a single test to verify the "Source left" and "Source
> right" paths and peg revs shown on "a tree-conflicted" `svn info'...

While we're on the topic of what we're not testing:
We don't seem to have any tests which verify copyfrom information
as being recorded correctly either...

Stefan

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2414682

Tests. -- was: Re: tree conflict infos

by Neels Janosch Hofmeyr-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:02:21PM +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I notice we don't have a single test to verify the "Source left" and "Source
>> right" paths and peg revs shown on "a tree-conflicted" `svn info'...
>
> While we're on the topic of what we're not testing:
> We don't seem to have any tests which verify copyfrom information
> as being recorded correctly either...

sheesh, who needs tests anyway.

Seriously though, it would be great if the svn power users out there would
model their use case cycles in tests. I've got one on the other line trying,
and he's quite disappointed with the current lack of tests.

The other way would be to try and find every loathsome permutation of
everything and write all of those into tests -- not trivial at all. That
would need a serious sponsor.

So my guess is, if corner-case-hitters would document their workflow in
cmdline tests, we'd have a pretty optimal coverage. It's definitely in the
interest of power-user corner-case-hitters to do so.

~Neels

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2414732

signature.asc (205 bytes) Download Attachment

Re: Tests. -- was: Re: tree conflict infos

by Stefan Sperling-7 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:48:28PM +0100, Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:

> Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:02:21PM +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I notice we don't have a single test to verify the "Source left" and "Source
> >> right" paths and peg revs shown on "a tree-conflicted" `svn info'...
> >
> > While we're on the topic of what we're not testing:
> > We don't seem to have any tests which verify copyfrom information
> > as being recorded correctly either...
>
> sheesh, who needs tests anyway.

Bert has added a copyfrom test, but it does not cover the copyfrom
case I have broken on trunk. I'll expand the test, and fix the breakage,
shortly.

Stefan

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2414745