|
View:
New views
8 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
uArchHello all,
just wanted to post a quick message. we are looking for feedback on uarch a micro linux distro. its basically a port of archlinux to uclibc and its moving along quite well you can find more information here uArch any feedback would be helpful Regards, Mike Rosset |
|
|
Re: uArchzio wrote:
> Hello all, > > just wanted to post a quick message. we are looking for feedback on uarch a > micro linux distro. its basically a port of archlinux to uclibc and its > moving along quite well you can find more information here > http://code.google.com/p/uarch/ uArch > > any feedback would be helpful > I guess you have tried gentoo before embarking down this route? You can drop out a basic bootable image starting at about 5MB and go up from there. Simple to build binary packages and merge them using qmerge. Build binary images for the architecture of your choice (although to be fair cross compiling for non native architectures adds some extra steps which are somewhat complicated). Use uclibc/mdev/udev or whatever takes your fancy... I have just used it to knock out a basic distro for an embedded appliance. Very fast to customise (although probably you need a bit of time to setup your build environment first time). Also very easy to get the image size nice and tight Good luck Ed W _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@... http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc |
|
|
Re: uArchActually Ed, uArch currently has a complete roofs including toolchain
and kernel. all installable from web into dir or mounted dir. if you
install to a mount point you can boot the partition or if you install
to a dir, chroot.
Creating new packages is extremely easy, even more so if your use to Arch Linux's abs. And its all managed with pacman, install new packages remove packages, upgrade system etc. Current draw back, I still have not worked out a base-micro group using busybox. So a base file system is quite large. "mainly good for developers at this point". Currently only supports i386 however once I think i386 is pretty stable. I'm going to start porting to arm. Anyone is welcome to help out if there intrested. install instructions can be found at uArch Regards, Mike On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Ed W <lists@...> wrote: zio wrote: _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@... http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc |
|
|
Re: uArchOn Wednesday 23 April 2008 15:35, Ed W wrote:
> I guess you have tried gentoo before embarking down this route? You can > drop out a basic bootable image starting at about 5MB and go up from > there. Simple to build binary packages and merge them using qmerge. > Build binary images for the architecture of your choice (although to be > fair cross compiling for non native architectures adds some extra steps > which are somewhat complicated). Use uclibc/mdev/udev or whatever takes > your fancy... Sounds surprisingly sane. Maybe it even uses something less arcane than init-with-runlevels- and-tons-of-scripts-in-/etc? -- vda _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@... http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc |
|
|
Re: uArchActually uArch currently has a complete rootfs including toolchain
and kernel. all installable from web into dir or mounted dir. if you
install to a mount point you can boot the partition or if you install
to a dir, chroot.
Creating new packages is extremely easy, even more so if your use to Arch Linux's abs. And its all managed with pacman, install new packages remove packages, upgrade system etc. Current draw back, I still have not worked out a base-micro group using busybox. So a base file system is quite large. "mainly good for developers at this point". Currently only supports i386 however once I think i386 is pretty stable. I'm going to start porting to arm. Anyone is welcome to help out if there intrested. install instructions can be found at uArch Regards, Mike On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...> wrote: On Wednesday 23 April 2008 15:35, Ed W wrote: _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@... http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc |
|
|
Re: uArchOn Wednesday 23 April 2008 15:35, Ed W wrote: I don't really know arch-linux so I don't know if you are being ironic about that or gentoo? However, I can dip into the buildroot and turn on or off services using (from my build script): # Don't start unneeded and unavailable servicesBuilding a root file system is easily scriptable, but the first few lines of my build script look like: export PROJECT=base1Roughly speaking you run this under a chroot which matches your target environment (eg I use an x586 environment although the host is running AMD64), then this builds you a simple (small) base filesystem which will do not much more than boot and give you a busybox shell. Customise or add software from there. eg: emerge -avK dropbear postfix dovecot madwifi-ng wpa_supplicant hostapd openntpd dnsmasq e2fsprogs ppp l7-protocols iptables firehol gpsd See the Tiny Gentoo entry on the gentoo wiki for a leg up, but you can do much better than that and I could be badgered to add my build scripts somewhere if people were interested. Takes a couple of mins only to build a new base layout (and mine is now about 120MB of stuff using mdev, busybox and uclibc! ) All the best Ed W _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@... http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc |
|
|
Re: uArchI do use tinygentoo at times. however I've since ported arch linux to uclibc . so to create a base system is as easy as
"for devel chroot" sudo ./pacman.static -Sy base base-devel --config ./pacman.conf -r ./uarch_root or for micro chroot sudo ./pacman.static -Sy busybox --config ./pacman.conf -r ./uarch_root I have full instructins here uArch . The instructions are longer then they need to be since it convers none arch systems "I plan to condense it down to one install script". basically the difference is you do not require a chroot to create a chroot. Arch uses bsd style init scripts if you need to add a service. you simple add it to /etc/rc.conf Mike
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Ed W <lists@...> wrote:
_______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@... http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc |
|
|
Re: uArchmike rosset wrote:
> I do use tinygentoo at times. however I've since ported arch linux to > uclibc . so to create a base system is as easy as > > "for devel chroot" Sounds very cool! I admit to being ignorant of the details of uArch - it's now on my todo list. Thanks for your work and good luck! Ed W _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list uClibc@... http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uclibc |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |