|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
unresolved's on gcc profiling testsHi,
The other source of noise in RTEMS test results are the profiling tests. Again the latest powerpc-rtems results: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-12/msg01477.html A typical noise entry is: FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c compilation, -fprofile-generate -O3 UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c execution, -fprofile-generate -O3 UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c compilation, -fprofile-use -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -O3 -fwhole-program -combine UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c execution, -fprofile-use -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -O3 -fwhole-program -combine So generally saying profiling isn't going to work on this target would eliminate a bunch of noise. My goal is to get results that accurately reflect the target so I can then begin to focus more on the real failures. Thanks. -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherrill@... On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu |
|
|
Re: unresolved's on gcc profiling testsOn Wed, 2008-12-17 at 16:09 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi, > > The other source of noise in RTEMS test results > are the profiling tests. Again the latest > powerpc-rtems results: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-12/msg01477.html > > A typical noise entry is: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c compilation, -fprofile-generate -O3 > UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c execution, -fprofile-generate -O3 > UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c compilation, -fprofile-use > -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -O3 -fwhole-program -combine > UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c execution, -fprofile-use > -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -O3 -fwhole-program -combine > > So generally saying profiling isn't going to > work on this target would eliminate a bunch of > noise. > > My goal is to get results that accurately reflect > the target so I can then begin to focus more on the > real failures. This is specific to the GCC testsuite, which already has the support you need. Add your target(s) to check_profiling_available in gcc/lib/target-supports.exp. Janis _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu |
|
|
Re: unresolved's on gcc profiling testsJanis Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 16:09 -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The other source of noise in RTEMS test results >> are the profiling tests. Again the latest >> powerpc-rtems results: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-12/msg01477.html >> >> A typical noise entry is: >> >> FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c compilation, -fprofile-generate -O3 >> UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c execution, -fprofile-generate -O3 >> UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c compilation, -fprofile-use >> -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -O3 -fwhole-program -combine >> UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-6.c execution, -fprofile-use >> -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -O3 -fwhole-program -combine >> >> So generally saying profiling isn't going to >> work on this target would eliminate a bunch of >> noise. >> >> My goal is to get results that accurately reflect >> the target so I can then begin to focus more on the >> real failures. >> > > This is specific to the GCC testsuite, which already has the support > you need. Add your target(s) to check_profiling_available in > gcc/lib/target-supports.exp. > Thanks for the tip. Does this look about right? I have a powerpc run going now and will repeat it with this patch in if you think it looks right. :) Index: lib/target-supports.exp =================================================================== --- lib/target-supports.exp (revision 142815) +++ lib/target-supports.exp (working copy) @@ -452,6 +452,11 @@ return 0 } + # At present, there is no profiling support on RTEMS. + if { [istarget *-*-rtems*] } { + return 0 + } + # At present, there is no profiling support on NetWare. if { [istarget *-*-netware*] } { return 0 > Janis > > -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherrill@... On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985 _______________________________________________ DejaGnu mailing list DejaGnu@... http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |