|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
updating without ldap and mdnsI've recently started building CURRENT with the mk.conf options:
MKLDAP=no MKATF=no MKISCSI=no MKMDNS=no And was wondering what the best way is to cull the left over files from the filesystem. Is there some automated way that does a destdir comparison or other? TIA, Sarton |
|
|
Re: updating without ldap and mdnsOn Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 04:51:21PM +1100, Sarton O'Brien wrote:
> I've recently started building CURRENT with the mk.conf options: > > MKLDAP=no > MKATF=no > MKISCSI=no > MKMDNS=no > > And was wondering what the best way is to cull the left over files from > the filesystem. Is there some automated way that does a destdir > comparison or other? If you started a "from-scratch" build, I'm unsure what the "left over" files are - please file a PR for the files if this is the case. If you modified build options and then did an update build, well, you'll run into a number of problems, I should think. HTH, Alistair |
|
|
Re: updating without ldap and mdnsOn Oct 28, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Alistair Crooks wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 04:51:21PM +1100, Sarton O'Brien wrote: >> I've recently started building CURRENT with the mk.conf options: >> >> MKLDAP=no >> MKATF=no >> MKISCSI=no >> MKMDNS=no >> >> And was wondering what the best way is to cull the left over files >> from >> the filesystem. Is there some automated way that does a destdir >> comparison or other? > > If you started a "from-scratch" build, I'm unsure what the "left over" > files are - please file a PR for the files if this is the case. > > If you modified build options and then did an update build, well, > you'll run into a number of problems, I should think. > installation, not the build images. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb |
|
|
Re: updating without ldap and mdnsOn 29/10/2009 12:46 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
> > On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Alistair Crooks wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 04:51:21PM +1100, Sarton O'Brien wrote: >>> I've recently started building CURRENT with the mk.conf options: >>> >>> MKLDAP=no >>> MKATF=no >>> MKISCSI=no >>> MKMDNS=no >>> >>> And was wondering what the best way is to cull the left over files from >>> the filesystem. Is there some automated way that does a destdir >>> comparison or other? >> >> If you started a "from-scratch" build, I'm unsure what the "left over" >> files are - please file a PR for the files if this is the case. >> >> If you modified build options and then did an update build, well, >> you'll run into a number of problems, I should think. >> > I assumed the question referred to the target system after installation, > not the build images. Exactly :) The part where I mentioned a comparison with destdir seems to have been snipped which now makes this message rather out of context. To clarify, I'll restate: After a 'build.sh install=/', having built with the options mentioned above, is there a way to cull the remaining files in the _target_ filesystem that remain from a previous installation that occurred without the options mentioned above? Well that was a mouthful. I'd like them to be considered obsolete but I really don't know how that part of postinstall works at all. I could have used the flist error when building but only thought of that after the fact. Sarton |
|
|
Re: updating without ldap and mdnsOn 29/10/2009 12:42 AM, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> If you modified build options and then did an update build, well, > you'll run into a number of problems, I should think. Really? From what I have witnessed, at the end of the build there is an flist error and the unneeded files are listed but that's it. From what I can see, the options merely exclude components from the build, is there something fundamentally integrated that I should be aware of with regards to the options I listed? I've done two builds on two separate machines, one update and the other 'from-scratch' with no discernible difference. In both cases the target filesystem still ends up with more files than needed which could potentially cause me some package grief down the track, which is my primary concern. Sarton |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |