Nabble - w3.org - public-glossary

Is public glossary still open?

2008-10-01T06:42:24Z

Hello to everyone!

I responded to a topic regarding NASA actions. Time passed, but nobody commented it.

And as I can see, where are no new topics to discuss.

Is this group still working? Or should I join a group which is analogous?

Sincerely,

Sally Morgan Ecommerce-Land Company

sally@... http://www.ecommerce-land.com

Re: nasa

2008-09-03T08:43:00Z

Hello Candace,

Very interesting article! Thank you.

But I wonder whether NASA takes care of everything regarding organization process and scientific equipment?

As far as I know, human being is still not completely aware of the life on the moon. And there is always some risk to the staff of astronauts. Also, according to some information sources, we do not have enough professional equipment to set the permanent base on the moon, even if it is NASA moonbase.

Do you know any sources where I can find established fact regarding this “NASA and The Moon” question.

Regards,

Sally Morgan Ecommerce-Land Company

sally@... http://www.ecommerce-land.com

nasa

2007-09-24T11:11:11Z

nasa moonbase

The next astronauts to work on the moon will likely live in larger
habitats and drive sporty new rovers capable of
two-week treks, NASA officials said Thursday.

Rather than assembling a lunar outpost over time from a multitude of
small, separately launched modules, NASA is now hoping
to land up to three large habitats on fewer flights to build a beachhead
on the moon, the space agency said.

Doug Cooke, NASA's deputy associate administrator for exploration
systems, said that the space agency's revised lunar plan
calls for the launching of larger habitats to the moon on unmanned cargo
flights.

? Click here to visit FOXNews.com's Space Center.

That way, the first new lunar astronauts could begin to reap science
rewards faster than if they had to haul smaller habitat
sections and hardware to the moon on each flight, then combine them into
a larger base to support long-duration expeditions.

"We want to get scientific return. We want to get information that will
help, potentially, space commerce and we want to get
international participation early," Cooke told reporters in a
teleconference. "All of these objectives we want to address as early
in the flights as we possibly can by getting the outpost up and running
quickly."

http://www.wholeearthphonesex.com
http://www.phone-sex-psychologist.com
http://www.phone-sex-hypnosis.com
http://www.phone-sex-dictionary.com
http://www.phone-sex-handjobs.com
http://www.your-account.info
http://www.freephonesex.org
http://www.1800phonesex.net
http://www.1on1phonesex.com
http://www.phonesexphone.com
http://www.hotphone.com
http://www.xxx-rated.com

Re: Legal Notice in Individual SKOS Glossaries Missing

2007-08-08T14:53:21Z

Dominique Hazael-Massieux,

It would be good if we kept the dc:rights for human-readable copyright notice, and eventually use dcterms:license for the license URL. So, the rdf:Description with an empty rdf:about wouldn't be needed and instead, the following properties could be added to the main rdf:Description.

<dcterms:license xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231"/>
<dc:rights>Copyright © [THE RELEVANT COPYRIGHT STATEMENT]</dc:rights>

I'd also like to take this opportunity to thank you on behalf of the Forrest community.

Sina K. Heshmati

On Tue, August 7, 2007 3:44 pm, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@...> said:

>
> Hi,
> Le vendredi 03 août 2007 à 16:03 +0200, Sina K. Heshmati a
> écrit :
>> A few glossaries that are made available [2] by the W3C Glossary and Dictionary
>> Project [3] in SKOS format have been selected to serve as samples to demonstrate
>> how the plugin aggregates content from external sources.
>>
>> As a result, the content from an external source may be presented in pages with
>> Apache copyright statement. Therefore, we need to make sure that the right legal
>> notice is associated with the aggregated content. To that end, I was wondering
>> if a project committer could add an explicit legal notice to SKOS glossaries
>> [2],
>> so that we'll be able to refer to those resources in our source code.
>
> I have added the following notice to most glossaries in the W3C
> glossary:
>
> <rdf:Description rdf:about="">
> <dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231"
> />
> </rdf:Description>
>
> There is once instance where the license terms refer to a different URI
> (the one for the HTTP spec), and one for which the licensing terms are
> undefined (and for which I didn't set any value).
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Dom
>
>> [1] http://forrest.apache.org/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/data/glossaries/
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/01/Glossary
>
>

Re: Legal Notice in Individual SKOS Glossaries Missing

2007-08-07T07:44:27Z

Hi,
Le vendredi 03 août 2007 à 16:03 +0200, Sina K. Heshmati a écrit :
> A few glossaries that are made available [2] by the W3C Glossary and Dictionary Project [3] in SKOS format have been selected to serve as samples to demonstrate
> how the plugin aggregates content from external sources.
>
> As a result, the content from an external source may be presented in pages with
> Apache copyright statement. Therefore, we need to make sure that the right legal
> notice is associated with the aggregated content. To that end, I was wondering
> if a project committer could add an explicit legal notice to SKOS glossaries [2],
> so that we'll be able to refer to those resources in our source code.

I have added the following notice to most glossaries in the W3C
glossary:

<rdf:Description rdf:about="">
<dc:rights xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231" />
</rdf:Description>

There is once instance where the license terms refer to a different URI
(the one for the HTTP spec), and one for which the licensing terms are
undefined (and for which I didn't set any value).

Hope this helps,

Dom

> [1] http://forrest.apache.org/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/data/glossaries/
> [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/01/Glossary

Legal Notice in Individual SKOS Glossaries Missing

2007-08-03T08:03:12Z

ugin to support the SKOS vocabulary is being developed for Apache Forrest [1].
A few glossaries that are made available [2] by the W3C Glossary and Dictionary Project [3] in SKOS format have been selected to serve as samples to demonstrate
how the plugin aggregates content from external sources.

As a result, the content from an external source may be presented in pages with
Apache copyright statement. Therefore, we need to make sure that the right legal
notice is associated with the aggregated content. To that end, I was wondering
if a project committer could add an explicit legal notice to SKOS glossaries [2],
so that we'll be able to refer to those resources in our source code.

Sina K. Heshmati

[1] http://forrest.apache.org/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/data/glossaries/
[3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/01/Glossary

Re: New glossaries added to W3C Glossary

2007-01-23T12:10:30Z

Le mardi 23 janvier 2007 à 16:54 +0000, Dan Brickley a écrit :
> Can you add a (more prominent) link back to the top of the Glossary site?

Err... Doesn't the logo at the top of the page work? Anyway, I've added
a link "W3C Glossaries" under the <h1> of the results pages.

> BTW is there still a SKOS version?

Yes; the RDF files are available at:
http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/data/glossaries/

> How do you deal with the hypertext
> fragments?

Using rdf:parseType="Literal".

> And did you see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Dec/0036.html

Nope, I hadn't; I'm not sure I'll have time to reply to that survey in
any reasonable time, but feel free to notice the relevant persons that
the W3C Glossary is relying on SKOS (or at least some version of it - I
haven't followed the possible recent evolutions of the vocabulary).

> Does http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/analysis still describe
> the workings of the system reasonably well?

Yes, I think it does.

> The note in
> http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/01/Glossary says
> """it's now using the SKOS Schema produced by the SWAD-EU activity as
> much as possible, instead of the custom schema it was using until now."""
>
> Now would probably be a good time to revisit any issues with SKOS that
> you had... (apologies if I've missed a mail thread on that)

I don't think that beyond the hypertext fragment thingy we noticed any
real problem with SKOS...

HTH,

Dom

Re: New glossaries added to W3C Glossary

2007-01-23T08:54:29Z

Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Four new glossaries (based on the 8 new recommendations that were
> published today) have been added to the W3C Glossary today:
> * XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model (XDM)
> http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/xpath-datamodel/
> * XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language
> http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/xquery/
> * XSL Transformations (XSLT) 2.0
> http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/xslt20/
> * XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0
> http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/xpath20/

Nice work Dom :)

Can you add a (more prominent) link back to the top of the Glossary site?

BTW is there still a SKOS version? How do you deal with the hypertext
fragments? And did you see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Dec/0036.html

Does http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/analysis still describe
the workings of the system reasonably well? The note in
http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/01/Glossary says
"""it's now using the SKOS Schema produced by the SWAD-EU activity as
much as possible, instead of the custom schema it was using until now."""

Now would probably be a good time to revisit any issues with SKOS that
you had... (apologies if I've missed a mail thread on that)

cheers,

Dan

New glossaries added to W3C Glossary

2007-01-23T07:30:04Z

Hi,

Four new glossaries (based on the 8 new recommendations that were
published today) have been added to the W3C Glossary today:
* XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model (XDM)
http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/xpath-datamodel/
* XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language
http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/xquery/
* XSL Transformations (XSLT) 2.0
http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/xslt20/
* XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0
http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/xpath20/

Dom

W3C Glossary update

2006-01-04T06:14:15Z

Hi,

From now on, I'm going to announce update and changes to the W3C central
Glossary [1] to this mailing list; this means very little actual
traffic, since most glossaries are as stable as their underlying W3C
Recommendation, and new glossaries mostly happen when new Recommendation
that include a glossary are published.

To start this, here is a notice that I updated the Device Independence
Glossary [2] to match the latest TR version [3]; also, back in August, I
updated the glossary attached to the Specification Guidelines [4].

As a reminder, the data behind the glossary system are available in
RDF/SKOS at:
http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/data/glossaries/

Dom

1. http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/
2. http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/di-gloss.rdf/
3. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-di-gloss-20050118/
4. http://www.w3.org/2003/glossary/subglossary/qaframe-spec.rdf/
--
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@...

signature.asc (196 bytes) Download Attachment

Announcing SKOS Core 2nd Public Working Drafts

2005-11-30T02:28:40Z

W3C Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group

We are pleased to announce the publication of the following technical reports as
second W3C Public Working Drafts:

SKOS Core Guide
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102/

SKOS Core Vocabulary Specification
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-spec-20051102/

For a summary of revisions since first Working Draft publication see:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-spec-20051102/#secchanges

SKOS Core is a simple, flexible and extensible language for expressing in a
machine-understandable form the structure and content of concept schemes such as
thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies,
'folksonomies', other types of controlled vocabulary, and also concept schemes
embedded in glossaries and terminologies.

For links to tutorials, presentations, development information, version history,
translations, proposals, datasets and more see the SKOS Core home page:

http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core/

The SKOS Core Vocabulary is an application of the Resource Description Framework
(RDF). Using RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other data. In
practice, this means that distributed sources of data can be meaningfully
composed and integrated.

For more information about RDF and related specifications, see the Semantic Web
Activity home page:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/

The 'SKOS Core Guide' is a guide to the recommended usage of the SKOS Core
Vocabulary, for readers who already have a basic understanding of RDF concepts.

The 'SKOS Core Vocabulary Specification' gives a reference-style overview of the
SKOS Core Vocabulary, and describes policies for ownership, naming, persistence
and change management.

These reports are second public Working Drafts, and are work in progress. We
ask at this stage for feedback from anyone with a potential interest in using
these specifications, or with relevant expertise. Please send comments and
suggestions on these drafts to public-esw-thes@... and begin the subject line
of the message with 'comment:'. If possible, please send comments before 31st
January 2006.

The Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group is committed to a
public, consensus-driven design environment for SKOS Core, and to this end
conducts all SKOS-related discussion in public, in particular drawing on
feedback from the Semantic Web Interest Group mailing list:

public-esw-thes@...

This work has benefited greatly from contributions made
by the members of this mailing list, and their feedback, suggestions and
encouragement are gratefully acknowledged. The public-esw-thes@... mailing
list is open, and anyone is welcome to subscribe or to post messages. To
subscribe, send an email to public-esw-thes-request@... with the subject line
'subscribe', or activate the following link:

mailto:public-esw-thes-request@...?subject=subscribe

Yours on behalf of W3C Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group,

Alistair Miles

---
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
CCLRC - Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Building R1 Room 1.60
Fermi Avenue
Chilton
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Email: a.j.miles@...
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440