|
View:
New views
7 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
what's the current status of python-psyco package?once upon a time, there existed python-psyco. and now, "yum search" begs to differ. on the other hand, there's this: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=72241 so is there a reason python-psyco is no longer part of the standard fedora feed? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: what's the current status of python-psyco package?Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> once upon a time, there existed python-psyco. and now, "yum > search" begs to differ. on the other hand, there's this: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=72241 > > so is there a reason python-psyco is no longer part of the standard > fedora feed? It is only available on i?86, so if you're running x86_64, it's not available unless, I believe, you have the yum multilib_policy option set to all. It defaults to best, which only installs packages for the arch you are running. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Every side I get up on is the wrong side of bed. If it weren't so expensive, I'd wish I were dead. -- signed Unhappy -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: what's the current status of python-psyco package?I wrote:
> It is only available on i?86, so if you're running x86_64, it's not > available unless, I believe, you have the yum multilib_policy option > set to all. It defaults to best, which only installs packages for > the arch you are running. I take that last bit back. The python-psyco package is not available at all on x86_64, regardless of how may set multilib_policy. :) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ There is no stronger bond of friendship than a mutual enemy. -- Frankfort Moore -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: what's the current status of python-psyco package?On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> I wrote: > > It is only available on i?86, so if you're running x86_64, it's > > not available unless, I believe, you have the yum multilib_policy > > option set to all. It defaults to best, which only installs > > packages for the arch you are running. > > I take that last bit back. The python-psyco package is not > available at all on x86_64, regardless of how may set > multilib_policy. :) what's the reasoning for that? is it because that package has no value in a 64-bit environment? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday ======================================================================== -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: what's the current status of python-psyco package?Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> what's the reasoning for that? is it because that package has no > value in a 64-bit environment? The specfile¹ says: # Upstream makes *heavy* use of inline x86 asm this would take extensive # work to support anything other than x86. See the URL for more info. # http://psyco.sourceforge.net/links.html # # """ # Here are a couple of non-Pythonic dynamic compilation projects. I am # often pointed to them as potentials back-ends for Psyco, to help make # Psyco portable beyond the current x86 machine code. However, I consider # them as not really suited for Psyco. # """ ¹ http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/python-psyco/devel/python-psyco.spec?view=markup -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A good scapegoat is almost as good as a solution. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: what's the current status of python-psyco package?Am Freitag, den 06.11.2009, 08:59 -0500 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > > > > I take that last bit back. The python-psyco package is not > > available at all on x86_64, regardless of how may set > > multilib_policy. :) > > what's the reasoning for that? is it because that package has no > value in a 64-bit environment? > re-writing large areas of code (at least the code generation part, maybe some optimization parts...) Just compiling the present code will result in a cross-just-in-time compiler, which still will generate x86-code... Joerg -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: what's the current status of python-psyco package?On 09-11-06 09:34:29, Joerg Bergmann wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 06.11.2009, 08:59 -0500 schrieb Robert P. J. Day: > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > > > > > > > I take that last bit back. The python-psyco package is not > > > available at all on x86_64, regardless of how may set > > > multilib_policy. :) > > > > what's the reasoning for that? is it because that package has no > > value in a 64-bit environment? > > > It's a compiler, and porting a compiler to another platform means > re-writing large areas of code (at least the code generation part, > maybe some optimization parts...) Just compiling the present code > will result in a cross-just-in-time compiler, which still will > generate > x86-code... If you just want the 32-bit version, just get it from a 32-bit repo and localinstall it? -- ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@...> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |