|
»
why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
|
View:
New views
11 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by born-4
::
Rate this Message:
hi,all!
before Oct 29th,I had install the ubuntu 910 beta on my notebook.At that time,it use 35 seconds to login into the system . Yesterday,I installed the ubuntu 910 standard on the notebook.Now it use 75 seconds to login into the system. My notebook is ASUS x31.the memory is 2G. Is someone know the reason? Thanks any way! -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by Steve Flynn
::
Rate this Message:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:45 AM, born <linuxbqj@...> wrote:
> before Oct 29th,I had install the ubuntu 910 beta on my notebook.At > that time,it use 35 seconds to login into the system . > Yesterday,I installed the ubuntu 910 standard on the notebook.Now it use 75 > seconds to login into the system. > > My notebook is ASUS x31.the memory is 2G. > Is someone know the reason? Thanks any way! It would be useful if you supplied a bootchart for your machine. Don't post the png file it produces to the list - put it onto a fileshare site and paste a link to it. -- Steve When one person suffers from a delusion it is insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion. 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by Laxman Patel
::
Rate this Message:
I am facing same problem..............
Thanks and regards ............. Laxman Undergraduate Student (B.Tech. Part-IV), Centre of Advanced Studies, Department of Electronics Engineering, Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi,UP- 221005, INDIA. E-Mail : laxman.ece06@... Address : #100 Visvesvaryya Hostel, IT-BHU. Mobile No. 9389223528 .................................................................. On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:15 PM, born <linuxbqj@...> wrote: hi,all! -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by born-4
::
Rate this Message:
Thanks.
I can't find the menu.lst,but find a file grub.cfg. This is my bootchart. " menuentry "Ubuntu, Linux 2.6.31-14-generic (on /dev/sda1)" { insmod ext2 set root=(hd0,1) search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set 5ab34f14-7ee6-4746-96f2-66d456292f0a linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-14-generic root=UUID=5ab34f14-7ee6-4746-96f2-66d456292f0a ro quiet splash initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-14-generic } " My file system is ext4. 2009/11/1 Steve Flynn <anothermindbomb@...>
-- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by Steve Flynn
::
Rate this Message:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 12:18 PM, born <linuxbqj@...> wrote:
> Thanks. > > I can't find the menu.lst,but find a file grub.cfg. Sorry - I mean a bootchart graphic, as produced by the bootchart utility (http://www.bootchart.org/) It's in the repos if it's not already installed on your machine. -- Steve When one person suffers from a delusion it is insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion. 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by born-4
::
Rate this Message:
Sorry,it's my fault。I will install that tool and put the bootchart result.
Thanks. 2009/11/1 Steve Flynn <anothermindbomb@...>
-- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by NoOp-4
::
Rate this Message:
On 11/01/2009 03:45 AM, born wrote:
> hi,all! > before Oct 29th,I had install the ubuntu 910 beta on my notebook.At > that time,it use 35 seconds to login into the system . > Yesterday,I installed the ubuntu 910 standard on the notebook.Now it use 75 > seconds to login into the system. > > My notebook is ASUS x31.the memory is 2G. > Is someone know the reason? Thanks any way! > > <http://www.google.com/search?complete=0&hl=en&q=ubuntu+%2Bkarmic+%2Bslow+boot> leads to multiple bug reports. You might want to review those & see if perhaps there is an answer in one of them. Possibilities: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/384579 [Linux thinks there’s a floppy drive when there’s not. Probing slows down bootup by almost a minute.] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/405270 [Karmic slow boot] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/464369 [Very slow boot up times (2m 30s) on Karmic 9.10 compared to 25 secs with Jaunty 9.04.] More: https://launchpad.net/+search?field.text=karmic+%2Bslow+boot -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by born-4
::
Rate this Message:
hi,I update the kernel.Now it boot up fast.
I don't know why. 2009/11/2 NoOp <glgxg@...>
-- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by fyrbrds-2
::
Rate this Message:
At 17 seconds, this SATA RAID setup kicks the snot out of my windows startup time on the same system. Of course since this is the first non-wubi full install I have done so I have nothing to compare it to. I am using essentially the same software that I use on windows. Linux is much faster. The memory footprint is much lower. Even my normally bogged down Firefox with a zillion extensions is snappy. Whatever performance issues there are don't seem to affect my rig, aside from crappy wifi performance that is.
From: born <linuxbqj@...> Sent: Mon, Nov 2, 2009 3:09 am Subject: Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
hi,I update the kernel.Now it boot up fast.
I don't know why. 2009/11/2 NoOp <glgxg@...>
-- -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by Fred A. Miller
::
Rate this Message:
John Scott wrote:
> At 17 seconds, this SATA RAID setup kicks the snot out of my windows > startup time on the same system. Of course since this is the first > non-wubi full install I have done so I have nothing to compare it to. > I am using essentially the same software that I use on windows. Linux > is much faster. The memory footprint is much lower. Even my normally > bogged down Firefox with a zillion extensions is snappy. Whatever > performance issues there are don't seem to affect my rig, aside from > crappy wifi performance that is. Wifi....yes....SLOW! I tried to install on my HP Pav. with Opteron, SATA, nVidia, and 4G....the 64-bit version. There was a kernel problem, but I don't have it nailed down yet. I hope to find out tomorrow so I'll have more specs., but obviously, this shouldn't be happening. As to 9.10, on this Dell laptop, it's the first time I really like Gnome....have hated it for years. Further, all I've ever installed on a LOT of systems has been SUSE and now openSUSE.....YEARS of dedication to SUSE and KDE. This too might change, if there's a fix for the HP. I have a LOT of clients with them, so converting them is on hold for how. Fred -- Windows 7: I wanted more reliable, so I have more reliable. I use Linux. -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
|
|
Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow?
by fyrbrds-2
::
Rate this Message:
-----Original Message-----
From: Fred A. Miller <fmiller@...> Sent: Tue, Nov 3, 2009 3:08 am Subject: Re: why ubuntu 910 boot very slow? John Scott wrote: > At 17 seconds, this SATA RAID setup kicks the snot out of my windows > startup time on the same system. Of course since this is the first > non-wubi full install I have done so I have nothing to compare it to. > I am using essentially the same software that I use on windows. Linux > is much faster. The memory footprint is much lower. Even my normally > bogged down Firefox with a zillion extensions is snappy. Whatever > performance issues there are don't seem to affect my rig, aside from > crappy wifi performance that is. Wifi....yes....SLOW! I tried to install on my HP Pav. with Opteron, SATA, nVidia, and 4G....the 64-bit version. There was a kernel problem, but I don't have it nailed down yet. I hope to find out tomorrow so I'll have more specs., but obviously, this shouldn't be happening. As to 9.10, on this Dell laptop, it's the first time I really like Gnome....have hated it for years. Further, all I've ever installed on a LOT of systems has been SUSE and now openSUSE.....YEARS of dedication to SUSE and KDE. This too might change, if there's a fix for the HP. I have a LOT of clients with them, so converting them is on hold for how. Fred >_______________________________________\ HP, ouch. I got enough of them with my last Pavilion WMC. Bought it for its quiet operation. After 9 mo.s HP Update downloaded an auto-BIOS update that put the fan on full with no way to revert. Sounded like a jet engine in my living room. Then got the infamous HP tatoo failure bluescreen. Swore them off for all eternity. Google HP+Tatoo, and HP+fan full speed BIOS update. You get lots of tech docs of pissed off HP former customers. Seems HP routinely disables fan control whenever they see temperature-related support cases increase for a product. Try running the Ubunty diagnostic. You can skip most to get to the benchmark section. Will give you some performance info for your hard drive. Maybe that will answer some questions. Sounds like your hardware is similar to mine. I have a core2quad w/4G nvidia 6600 series. I've seen no problems with the SATA RAID (aside from the weird setup procedure) so far and I have transferred many large files. Give it a go. Just maintain good backups for a while. I used SuSE for around 6 years but my latest effort with OpenSuse did not end well. I swore by KDE too but it grew too bloated. Someone thought menus overflowing with half-baked programs would seem like a great value. It was actually just confusing. I was away from Linux for about 4 years. So I was a bit surprised when I returned to find GNOME much better, much more refined, and no crap on the menu. So I compared OpenSuSe and Ubuntu to see which I would prefer. OpenSuse left a lot more things un-configured and didn't support my Atheros wifi out of the box. Took a week to figure out how to enable it(even with prior experience). With Ubuntu, it took 10 seconds to type my WPA key and I was in, with Firefox right there on the menu and my bookmarks and passwords as well as my documents already imported. The choice was a no-brainer. Regards, John -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users@... Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
